• Mine your own business
• Mine your own business
Posted by
byork
at
2006-12-13 05:18 PM
Interesting new documentary film doing the rounds by Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney. They were interviewed on ABC Radio's Counterpoint. Transcript and audio here: http://www.abc.net.au/rn/counterpoint/stories/2006/1791367.htm Also article about it at spiked: http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2055/
From the spiked review:
'I could put you with a family and you count how many times in a day that family smile, if you could measure stress. Then I put you with a family well off, or in New York or London, and you count how many times people smile and measure stress… Then you tell me who is rich and who is poor.’
From the Counterpoint transcript, McAleer claims to be of the left: Phelim McAleer: Yes, it's funny, some people have called this documentary, Mine Your Own Business, a right wing documentary, and I'm a liberal leftie journalist from Europe and I'm going...how can I be right wing? I go to the poorest places in the world and talk to the poorest people in those poorest places in the world. That's the most left wing thing to do. But anyway, some people have labelled it a right wing documentary, and if that's what it looks like I'm not going to argue with them. The Wall Street Journal called it 'Michael Moore but without the smug liberal hypocrisy' which...I hope people can come to see it. It's in Melbourne tonight and in Sydney and Perth and Hobart, and I hope people will come and make up their own mind. I just go around the world talking to the poorest people in the poorest places about what people are saying they think, and very often what they think and what they believe and what they feel is very different from what middle class foreigners are telling the rest of the world what they think.
The greenies' honeymoon has lasted more than two decades but is ending - yet there's a long way to go.
Barry
|
Member
Posts:
421
|
• Re: Mine your own business
Posted by
arthur
at
2006-12-14 09:04 AM
It really is time to take the gloves off against these misanthropes. |
Manager
Posts:
559
|
• Re: Mine your own business
Posted by
patrickm
at
2006-12-15 05:19 PM
Looks like an interesting documentary, Unfortunately it’s not scheduled for showing in I suppose it won’t be shown on the biased public broadcaster the ABC (in Australia) but who knows - the issue of bias is now being more closely monitored and the green avalanche is (together with the Iraq coverage), their weakest point of obvious bias. So it might get forced through as part of the new closer scrutiny to ensure some balance! We will see, but I doubt it. Here is the directors’ statement; I also like the mental image I get from this interview (on an ABC radio
program no less) of that lefty Vanessa Redgrave gone totally pseudo and dripping with her
own gold jewelery;
Michael
Duffy: And I understand Vanessa
Redgrave...I've read this somewhere, she's opposed to the mine as well. Ann
McElhinney: She is. Actually it's
quite funny. She went to a film festival in Cluj, about three hours from the
mine site, and dedicated a lifetime achievement award to the villagers, as she
said, to the people who are opposed to the mine, as she thought. But there's a
great photograph of her, it's just priceless, with her opposing the gold mine
and she is resplendent, wearing a wonderful glistening gold necklace which I'm
sure is 18-carot and worth a few thousand, and it's just a beautiful image, a fantastic
image of exactly where her head's at. Priceless is right! |
• Re: Mine your own business
Posted by
arthur
at
2006-12-16 09:49 AM
I'm having difficulty understanding this post.
It starts off mentioning: the current mood of the times in the Beltway, which are about as dazed and miserablist-apocalyptophile as one can imagine. That put me in the mood when reading it quickly, to interpret the original text and/or the interpolated comments by Bruce Sterling as satarizing the "miserabilist-apocalyptophile" world outlook in the same sort of way that we would. But I'm honestly not sure whether either the original or the comments are actually intended to do that, and I suspect that neither was. This makes me feel that I "just don't get it" about the way people think and write about these issues. What do others think? Is the original mocking "miserabilist-apocalyptophile" thinking, or are the comments doing so, or is the use of that term just self-deprecating humour? Do news items that just look bizarrely "miserabilist-apocalyptophile" to me strike "normal" people properly attuned to the zeitgeist as grim warnings of actual imminent doom? |
Manager
Posts:
559
|