Literature about the future
Replies:
6
Views:
12387
Up one level
You need to be a registered member to post to this forum.
Register now.
|
• Re: Literature about the future
Posted by
tomb
at
2006-04-13 06:28 AM
read the book and figure it must be a sometime down the track as beijing is the good guys. Not sure if the future challenges will be the same as those of today. I yhink we might be looking at something less internal and divisive to humans.
|
• Re: Literature about the future
Posted by
tomb
at
2006-04-13 08:12 PM
are there any positive s/f books out there about an exciting future with some attempt to account for the social consequences of economic and technological development. Most seem to be a one sided argument focusing on one aspect of technology and ignoring the consequences for human development
|
• I Robot
Posted by
keza
at
2006-04-13 10:00 PM
I haven't read much sci fi recently.
But my impression is that most sci fi doesn't do a very good job of relating economic and social issues to technological change. "I robot" (Doctorow's version) contrasts a future society ( Beijing based) with a future society (Nth American based). The human possibilities in Beijing are more advanced and exciting because people there have embraced robots and developed an integrated human-robot society. However in the more backward part of the world, robots are seen as servile, lesser creatures who only exist to obey humans. This has led to a creeping totalitarianism involving constant attempts to hold back technology and prevent people having access to it in a fully fledged form ( ie robots which are not bound by the 3 laws are outlawed and seen as a terrible threat). At the same time, the people in control are prepared to secretly use "non-3-law robots" themselves in order to maintain their own power. It's a fairly simple and unrealistic scenario, but it does raise issues about how developments in robotics will give rise to possibilities which will conflict with the continuation of social conditions in which a few people run things and everybody else just turns up for work (although Doctorow doesn't himself raise this issue, it's only implicit). The more obvious issue is the one of whether humans have the right to (try to) prevent robots from developing into fully fledged people. I think that Asimov did face this issue and wasn't as totalitarian in his attitude to robots as Doctorow seems to think he was. I haven't read any Asimov in a while, but from memory I think he did see his 3 laws as extremely problematic in that they led to numerous paradoxes and conuundrums. |
• Re: Literature about the future
Posted by
tomb
at
2006-04-13 11:20 PM
I suppose I saw the 3 laws as being resolved before we get robotics to that point, but maybe not. The development of nano technology would seem to me to exclude any chance of those laws being enforceable. I am not even sure what robots would be. and what they would do. With nano they seem to be redundant before they devlop to that point. We in fact may be the robots!
|
• Re: Literature about the future
Posted by
keza
at
2006-04-13 11:31 PM
We already are robots! Organic, highly developed ones. Being "flesh and blood" doesn't make us not also complex machines. Developments in robotics will enable us to enhance the machinery we were born with and I think that's really great. In "I robot", Doctorow was basically making a case for the possibilities opened up by humans (organic robots) working closely with inorganic robots and at the same time enhancing themselves with extra bits of inorganic machinery. |
• Re: Literature about the future
Posted by
tomb
at
2006-04-14 05:43 AM
I have a feeling that when we become more robot-like we won't need robots other than those to do menial tasks which we wouldn't want to be frustrated by - but this gets into the questions "what is a robot?" and "what is an automation?"
|