Skip to content

LastSuperpower

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home » more temp news » test » Iraqis to Sign Constitution Despite Shi'ite Doubts

Iraqis to Sign Constitution Despite Shi'ite Doubts

Document Actions
"We don't want the rest of the Council to fear that the Shi'ites want to demolish the whole process. We don't want them to fear that the Shi'ites are trying to control things."

Date: 7 March 2004

Source: Kurdish Democratic Party

  • By Ghaith Abdul-Ahad NAJAF, Iraq (Reuters)

Iraq's Governing Council will sign an interim constitution Monday without demanding changes to the document, despite the reservations of the country's foremost Shi'ite cleric, Shi'ite politicians said.

Ahead of the planned signing, guerrillas fired 10 rockets at the headquarters of the U.S.-led administration in Baghdad on Sunday evening. The blasts echoed across Baghdad but the U.S. Army said there were no serious injuries.

The signing of the constitution, a foundation of the planned handover of sovereignty to an Iraqi government on June 30, has been repeatedly delayed because of disagreements between Iraq's religious and ethnic groups over the document.

"We will sign the interim constitution Monday as it stands," Mohammed Hussein Bahr al-Uloum, the son and chief adviser to Mohammed Bahr al-Uloum, the current president of the Iraqi Governing Council, told Reuters Sunday.

"We don't want the rest of the Council to fear that the Shi'ites want to demolish the whole process. We don't want them to fear that the Shi'ites are trying to control things."

Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, Iraq's most revered Shi'ite cleric, had objected to several parts of the document, in particular a clause that effectively gives Kurds, who make up some 20 percent of Iraq's population, a veto over the permanent charter which will be drawn up after elections next year.

A delegation of Shi'ite groups on the Council traveled to the holy city of Najaf over the weekend to meet Sistani and other senior clerics to try to overcome the impasse.

They said after the meeting that Sistani had given them the go-ahead to sign the document in spite of his misgivings.

"There are certain articles that the religious circles have reservations about (but) it seems that it will be that way, with no change, but with reservations from those circles as well as from the Kurds," said Adnan al-Asadi of the Shi'ite Dawa party.

REPEATED DELAYS

The Council missed a February 28 deadline to draw up the constitution but announced last Monday it had been agreed. A signing ceremony planned for last Wednesday was postponed after bomb attacks on Shi'ites in Baghdad and Kerbala killed 181 people on Iraq's bloodiest day since Saddam Hussein fell.

A high-profile ceremony last Friday ended in disarray after five Shi'ite members of the Council refused to sign at the last minute after learning of Sistani's objections. Sistani is pressing for Shi'ites, long oppressed under Saddam, to have political clout that matches their majority status in a democratic Iraq.

Officials in Najaf said Sistani still had grave doubts about elements of the document but accepted it should be signed in the interests of advancing the political transition in Iraq.

Iraq's U.S. governor Paul Bremer said in interviews on U.S. television he was confident it would be signed Monday.

"We hope that the signing ceremony will happen tomorrow," he said. "We've noted the statement by the current president of the Governing Council that they do intend to sign it tomorrow."

CLERICS UNHAPPY

Mohammed Hussein al-Hakim, who is the son of a senior Najaf cleric and sat in on the discussions, said leading clerics were unhappy with the document but understood its importance.

"The religious authorities have made their position clear to the politicians, but don't want to interfere directly," Hakim told Reuters. "They have deep reservations, but also know this interim constitution is a step in the right direction."

Others present said Sistani would have liked to push for changes, but felt the furthest he could go was to make his objections clear and leave it up to the politicians to do what they felt necessary.

Sistani, a 73-year-old Iranian-born religious scholar, has increasingly exerted his influence in politics in recent months. He has previously expressed objections to the U.S. timetable for handing back power, forcing the Americans to bring forward planned elections, and objected to the de facto veto.

"If we give the right of veto to one people, the whole constitutional process will be a vicious circle which could even harm the Kurds and the rest of the Iraqi people," said Hakim, who is the son of Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Saed al-Hakim.

The Council is due to reconvene Monday at 10 a.m. (0700 GMT) to debate the document further. Kurds, who want the interim constitution to protect their autonomous institutions in three northern provinces, have already said they will not accept changes.

"Everyone made concessions in the process, and everyone agreed to the result. There is no way you can accept (changes) at the last moment," said Adel Murad, deputy to Council member Jalal Talabani of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan.

"We've got a painful history, and it's only natural that we would seek some guarantees in this law."

_____________________

Back to News Index

Back to Welcome Page

Created by keza
Last modified 2004-03-08 01:11 AM
 

Powered by Plone

This site conforms to the following standards: